UPDATE:
Offering alcohol to minors are surely illegal.
--------
UPDATE: Now we know
he asked kids out. It's a much more serious thing than just dirty talks. But the kid did know Foley was fishing around. Can someone tell me that is legal or not?
--------
UPDATE: Now they said Foley is a
known sex predator. Don't know what exactly he did, but if he did ask kids out or harassed kids it's certainly troublesome. I really find myself at odd with the "liberal base," but, my question is, if all he did was having some consensual dirty talks with kids, is it really illegal (and that's what I see so far)? I'm not saying it's appropriate -- which is not -- but, I don't see it as a major problem either. BTW I do agree on going further on those cover-up allegations.
-------
UPDATE: Once again I have a second thought on this. After reading those messages on AIM, it seems to me that it's consensual, at least
the boy didn't show any resistence in talking dirty. I do understand it's inappropriate for a member of Congress to have this kind of conversation with a minor, but to be honest, I don't see it as a major offense. If a minor girl has the right to choose to have an abortion, which I believe is held in Planned Parenthood or somewhere else, I don't see why a minor boy cannot choose to have some dirty talk with a Congressman. I do feel like it's an intrusion to people's bedrooms. I agree he should have chosen not to have those conversations, but I just don't see those conversations as something that bad that he should resign for them. Let's face it, those conversations are consensual and there is no conflict of interests. Maybe he did the same thing to another page and pissed that one off, which may be the case. Otherwise if he just approached a boy, got rejected and left him alone, and approached another and got accpted and had some fun talks, I really don't see what's that much a big deal.
--------
UPDATE: Now I agree he went too far,
by refering to sexual organs and acts on AIM. I fully agree to raise some attacks at this point, but he's leaving anyway.
Hours earlier, ABC News had read excerpts of instant messages provided by former male pages who said the congressman, under the AOL Instant Messenger screen name Maf54, made repeated references to sexual organs and acts.
--------
In some sense it's good to know it's not patented for Jersey, but I personally really think it's nothing but nasty. I first saw
thisIn the series of e-mails, obtained by ABC News, between the page and Rep. Foley (R-FL), Foley asks the page how old he is, what he wants for his birthday and requests a photo of him.
The concerned page alerted congressional staffers to the e-mails. In one e-mail, the page writes to a staffer, "Maybe it is just me being paranoid, but seriously. This freaked me out."
and in one email
"I just email will...hes such a nice guy....acts much older than his age....and hes in very great shape...."
I was like, what? What's the problem? Then, just minutes ago, I saw
another postThe Co-Chair of the US House Missing and Exploited Children Caucus cannot be someone even under the appearance of possibly being a potential child sex offender (soliciting a minor is a crime). No one is saying Foley is a child sex offender, but his email exchange has raised understandable concerns in some minds. It's time to get to the bottom of this, for the sake of our children. It's time to waterboard GOP Rep. Mark Foley.
Finally the story will end
this wayRep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., submitted a letter of resignation from Congress on Friday in the wake of questions about e-mails he wrote a former male page, according to a congressional official.
Florida Republicans could replace Foley on the ballot.
As a previous victim, I do fully understand that emails can be huge harassments. And seems the boy who received those mails did feel this way.
According to the CREW posting, the boy e-mailed a colleague in Alexander's office about Foley's e-mails, saying, "This freaked me out." On the request for a photo, the boy repeated the word "sick" 13 times.
The problem here is the way this thing be treated. First, by reading those emails, I can only draw the conclusion that Foley may be gay and he may be interested in young boys. So here comes my question, what's the problem with that? If he didn't further harass the boy, and stopped when he realized the boy doesn't have any interest in him, what's really the probem? I mean, if you're interested in someone, then you try to approach the person, then you realize there is no chance at all and then give up, what's the problem? I do think it's a huge thing if he kept harassing the boy, sending all kinds of emails regardless the boy's negative responses, but so far it just doesn't look that way. Seems to me he's punished for being gay, and the ironic thing here is I first saw this on a blog owned by an openly gay guy. The only problem here I can see is soliciting minors, but just don't quite see it if someone just said "he's in good shape."
Almost everyone around me knows I'm for a Democratic majority, but I really don't like to win it by revealing opponents' personal life.